Archive for May, 2008

Countdown to Football Season: Team 30

Nonsportsmanlike Conduct! is AlwaysMostlyRight; it’s the sports blog for people who love sports but hate sports blogs.  Here’s a recent entry:

*********************************************************************

There’s still no good sports on TV — unless you count waiting for the Eventual Champion LA Lakers to beat either of the weak offerings from the East, and I don’t count the NBA as a sport at all– so I’m continuing counting down to real sports with:

The Boy’s Power Ranking Countdown To Football Season.
Team Number 30: The Cincinnati Bengals.
Division: AFC North.

Record Last Year: 7-9.
NC!’s One-Liner About Them: I once had the Bengals in a Superbowl bet — the year they played the 49ers. That, and the fact that Ocho Cinco filmed a commercial at our local high school last year are all I know about them.
The Boy’s Analysis: Quick question: what is the deal with Chad Johnson? Is he playing or not playing? Other than that they got Carson Palmer and ahhh… I guess that’s it. So I see the Cincinnati Bengals going way down. P.S. Tell me when there’s a week when a Bengal isn’t getting arrested.
So, Cincinnati: You’ve got your chili, but you’d have better luck finding Bengals in the pokey than in the playoffs this year.

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

Thinking The Lions is the hilarious compilation of the adventures of a guy with a lot of kids, a lot of love of 70s music, a lot of time to watch Battlestar Galactica, and a very patient wife. Life, only funnier.

Snack Food:

 

Leave a Comment

Have a good weekend!

Babies! Babies! Pets! Pets! wants your photos of Babies! and Pets!: submit them, and I’ll post them, and you might win a free t-shirt!

Here’s Mr F on the nature walk we took a couple of weeks ago, marching proudly towards the sunset, and boldly ignoring the path that I was standing on just a few feet away.

Mr F this week decided that he liked the song “All I Want Is You” by Barry Louis Polisar. I was playing it at home on the computer and he came and stood by the computer and just listened, mesmerized. So in honor of that, and because this picture sort of reminds me of that song, I’m going to paste the video for that song here, too, which you can listen to by clicking here, and picture walking through a field of new spring grass, with the sun shining towards you and your little 21-month old guy smiling and loving every minute of it.

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

Like horror stories? AfterDark has the best scary stories around.

Every day:

Leave a Comment

The Best Scary Kids’ Song

The Best of Everything exists to tabulate what I and you and everyone thinks is The Best in any category you can imagine and a lot you can’t. This appeared there first:
*******************************************
Some kids’ songs do not make much sense to me. That’s why I generally dispense with “kids” songs when I sing to the Babies! and instead focus on the songs I know by heart. Those are generally by The Beatles and The Violent Femmes, but you work with what you have. They don’t actually understand that “Rocky Raccoon” is a sad song, anyway.

I have to focus on grown-up songs because traditional kids’ songs are weird, confusing, or scary. Take “Pony Boy,” for example. I first learned to sing “Pony Boy” when my sister was born; I’m ten years older than her, so I was old enough to do all that baby stuff for her. Here’s how “Pony Boy” goes:

Pony Boy, Pony Boy, won’t you be my pony boy.
Marry me, carry me, ride away with me.
Don’t say no, here we go, giddy-up and go
Giddy-up, giddy-up, giddy-up, WHOA!
Pony Boy.

(As you sing it, you bounce the baby on your knee like he/she is riding a horse, and when you say “Whoa!” you lift the baby way up in the air).

We used to sing that to my sister, but it was weird. I couldn’t help wonder, as I sang it: Who is talking? Is she the Pony Boy and I’m singing to her? Or am I the Pony Boy and she’s supposed to be singing to me, which makes more sense? And then I’d think Or am I overthinking this?

Now, I sing that song to Mr F, but it’s even weirder. Is he the Pony Boy? And who’s he singing to, if he is? It’s so confusing that we mostly dispense with the rest of the song and focus on the “WHOA!” because he likes that the best anyway.

As a song, “Pony Boy” is preferable to the scarier end of the childrens’ song ouevre.

Everyone knows about the scariness of kids’ songs like “Ring Around The Rosie” and how that’s actually a song that became popular as a way to ward off the Black Plague. Or “London Bridge,” — not Fergie’s version — where kids sing about London Bridge falling down and a prisoner getting caught and sent to prison not because he’s guilty but because he can’t pay the bribe to set him free. Those are obvious ones. There are less-0bviously-scary kids’ songs to worry about, songs that range from the somewhat disturbing to the downright frightening.

On the somewhat disturbing end: “I’ve Been Working On The Railroad” and “The Wheels On The Bus.” What are these songs supposed to be teaching kids? Cheat on your husband while he works? Don’t trust mass transportation? I don’t like these songs.

In Railroad, I’ve been workin’ on the railroad, all the livelong day, just waiting for Dinah to blow her horn… but someone’s in the kitchen with Dinah, just a strummin’ on the old banjo. There’s a euphemism if ever I heard one.

Meanwhile, the wheels on the bus go round and round — until the engine on the bus blows and everyone has to get off, probably ending up late for work and getting laid off, having to go home and tell the kids that it’s macaroni for dinner that night again.

Another disturbing one? Three Little Fishies. Seems innocent enough:

Three little fishies in a little bitty pool.
Three little fishies and a mama fishy too.
Swim, said the Mama Fishy, swim if you can,
And they swam and they swam right over the dam.

But that’s only if you sing the first verse. There’s three more:

“Stop” said the mama fishie, “or you will get lost”
The three little fishies didn’t wanna be bossed
The three little fishies went off on a spree
And they swam and they swam right out to the sea
….

“Whee!” yelled the little fishies, “Here’s a lot of fun
We’ll swim in the sea till the day is done”
They swam and they swam, and it was a lark
Till all of a sudden they saw a shark!
….

“Help!” cried the little fishies, “Gee! look at all the whales!”
And quick as they could, they turned on their tails
And back to the pool in the meadow they swam
And they swam and they swam back over the dam
. . .

There are those who might say that the message of that story is that if you don’t listen to your parents, you’ll get into trouble. Those people do not have children. Children never get the right message. A kid, even a fish-kid, who refused to listen to Mama and swam over the dam and sees a shark and a whale and gets back home is not going to say to him- or herself “Gosh, I’d better listen to Mama next time.” No, what the fish will say is “See, Mama? You said I’d get in trouble but the sharks didn’t eat me so obviously I know what I’m doing.” Then he or she will get drunk on Friday night and you’ve lost control. Trust me on this. I have extensive experience being a kid and being around them. They will get it wrong.

Kids’ songs get even scarier and more confusing than that. How about “Where Is Thumbkin?” You know this one: Hold your hands behind your back, and sing:

Where is Thumbkin, Where is Thumbkin
Here I am, here I am
How are you today, sir?
Very fine I thank you.
Run away, run away.

While you hold up first one thumb, then the other, then pretend they’re talking to each other. One thumb asks “how are you,” the other responds, and so on. What could be wrong with that, you ask? I’ll tell you: why are they running away? If Thumbkin, and Tall Man and Pointer and Ring Man are all very fine I thank you, why do they run? They’re up to something.

Those songs are all somewhat obscurely weird and frightening. Other songs just come out and tell you people are going to die or that life isn’t worth even going through the motions.

Teaching kids the futility of life at a young age is important, apparently. Otherwise, we’d have no use for “Hole In the Bucket,” where a man sings about the hole in the bucket that he can’t patch because to patch it he needs to cut something with an axe and the axe needs to be sharpened and the stone is dry and he can’t wet the stone because… there’s a hole in the bucket. The lesson from that song? Don’t even bother getting out of bed, kids.

Don’t bother because life is not just futile, it’s fatal. We know that because “There Was An Old Woman,” a song that is marked by this closing line of virtually every stanza: I guess she’ll die.


Ha-ha! Sing that one, grandma! Also, it teaches kids to have an eating disorder. The Old Woman’s answer to every problem is to eat something.

Death is not just probable, but present, by the time we go from the Old Woman to “This Old Man,“in which an old man stalks a kid, probably touches him in a bad way (he played knick on the kid’s knee and ‘hive’ ), then dies (he plays knick-knack in Heaven), then comes back to life as a ghost or something and plays knick-knack some more. Lesson: Kids, you will never get away from that creepy guy that’s bothering you on the way home from school.

All of those pale in comparison to The Best Scary Kids’ Song, which is “Big Rock Candy Mountain.” I love this song; I loved it as a kid, when I had a 45 record and a little record player and would play it over and over; I loved it as an adult, when I’d sing it to kids. This is the version of the song that I always knew:

On a summer day
In the month of May
A burly bum came hiking
Down a shady lane
Through the sugar cane
He was looking for his liking
As he roamed along
He sang a song
Of the land of milk and honey
Where a bum can stay
For many a day
And he won’t need any money

Chorus:
Oh the buzzin’ of the bees
In the cigarette trees
Near the soda water fountain
At the lemonade springs
Where the bluebird sings
On the big rock candy mountain

There’s a lake of gin
We can both jump in
And the handouts grow on bushes
In the new-mown hay
We can sleep all day
And the bars all have free lunches
Where the mail train stops
And there ain’t no cops
And the folks are tender-hearted
Where you never change your socks
And you never throw rocks
And your hair is never parted
Chorus:

Oh, a farmer and his son,
They were on the run
To the hay field they were bounding
Said the bum to the son,
“Why don’t you come
To that big rock candy mountain?”
So the very next day
They hiked away,
The mileposts they were counting
But they never arrived
At the lemonade tide
On the big rock candy mountain

That version is bad enough; I don’t know how it got to be considered a kids’ song. Cigarettes? Gin? Burly bums? It’s a land of Teamsters setting up some sort of communist society. Plus, I think the bum abducts the farmers’ son at the end of that.

But that’s not the real version of the song. The real version of the song is even scarier. The real version of the song came out in 1928, and was sung by Harry McClintock:

That version makes it clear just what’s going on: people during the Great Depression, criminals, especially, are dreaming of a land where they can get free smokes and lemonade… and avoid the cops and if they get bit by dogs, the dogs won’t hurt because of their rubber teeth.

What makes that song so scary is first that it’s so rooted in real life; in its yearning for jails that you can leave, and lakes of stew, and porters having to tip their hats and the lack of shovels and picks, you can hear the longing of the singer for a place where life is a little easier and where he’ll be treated like a human being again, and have some food and drink.

But, second, it’s also a song that imagines that even in a magical land like The Big Rock Candy Mountain, even in a place where there’s lemonade springs and the bluebird sings, life is still nasty, brutish and short — because on The Big Rock Candy Mountain, they don’t just paddle around the lake of stew in a big canoe. They also have lynch mobs: they hung the jerk that invented work.

That’s what makes “Big Rock Candy Mountain” The Best Kids’ Song, though. Being a kid, as I recall and as I imagine now looking at my own kids, is exactly like that song: you’re in a world where life is magical, wonderful, and terrible. As a kid, food appears magically for you; you don’t know how hard your parents had to work to make sure that you had Cookie Crisp on the table in the morning, and milk is always just in the refrigerator. Everything in the world is new and exciting; I took our Babies! to the hardware store — the hardware store– and they stared around and smiled and laughed like it was Disneyland.

At the same time, life is hard. Your brother keeps stealing your little plastic pig. Strangers come up to you and loom over you and touch you. Parents go away for the day even though you don’t want them to. You bump your head and fall on your knee and get bit by the dog and touch the hot stove.

“Big Rock Candy Mountain” encapsulates that: there’s a land that’s fair and bright… but there’s still jails. It doesn’t sugarcoat that there are bad parts to life, but it manages to somehow be hopeful and a little happy at the same time. The sun shines every day and there ain’t no snow.

It teaches you, too, to appreciate the little things in life. You never change your socks. The hay is soft. You may not have a bed or much in the way of clothing, but if you look at it the right way, those are good things.

Most of what we tell kids as they’re growing up makes no sense, or will be misinterpreted by them in some way. “Big Rock Candy Mountain,” The Best Scary Kids’ Song doesn’t mess up its message with sharks or prisoners or Thumbkins-that-have-social-phobia; it just quietly communicates that kids should dream of a better life, but at the same time, understand this life and make sure they appreciate it.

Click here to see all the other topics I’ve ever discussed!

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

Lesbian Zombies Are Taking Over The World is a serialized novel. To keep up with the adventures of a lesbian zombie and her octopus in a timely manner, click that link.

Leave a Comment

It’s Cloverfield– with raccoons and brownies!

Thinking The Lions” is about life, only funnier. This first appeared on that site:

**********************************

Our anniversary was a complete success. We saw a great movie– yes, Indiana Jones and The Temple of The Crystal Skull was great and everyone who says it wasn’t is just a dork– ate a great dinner, and wreaked a little havoc.

About that dinner, first: after Sweetie read my preview of our anniversary celebration, she took issue with me. She said “How can you say I’m the less fancy of the two?”

I explained that I could say that because it’s true. She then said, in a very powerful rebuttal to my argument, that it was not true.

We then went out for dinner on our Alternate Anniversary (see, families? We don’t just make you celebrate alternate holidays; we do them, too) to a restaurant that serves, really, just sandwiches. I ordered the chicken sandwich, and was pleased to see that it came topped with liver sausage. I also got the fries. Sweetie ordered, in her far-more-fancy-than-me way, a grilled cheese. She got the salad, which in the manner of all salads in all restaurants everywhere, wasn’t a salad at all. When it came, it had purple things in it and something that looked like a pickle with spikes growing out of it. “Punk Rock Pickle Salad” was not on the menu. (But it should be.)

I asked what the spiked pickle was and Sweetie thought it might be arugula. But it’s not. This is arugula:

That’s not what the salad-thing looked like. I would show you a picture of the salad thing, but I can’t find my camera. Yes, I took pictures of Sweetie’s salad. I had my camera with me the whole day and I took four pictures: one of Sweetie, and three of her salad. Life with me is one big romantic journey.

Instead of an actual photograph, I’ll have to settle for an artist’s rendering of the Punk-Rock Pickle:

The actual punk-rock pickle had more spikes, but I got tired of drawing them.

After not finishing her salad, Sweetie ate her grilled cheese sandwich. I asked how she liked it, and she said, and I quote:

“It was a little too fancy for me.”

So I marked that date as the first one in which I not only won a debate with Sweetie, but a debate involving cheese– the highest level of debate.

The rest of the anniversary was celebrated exactly the way I predicted it would be — take that, Michio Kaku!– except with a lot more brownies than I had originally predicted, because we stopped off for snacks to take with us to the hotel, and I panicked because the bakery girl was very rude and forced my hand.

We were at the bakery and decided to get not just a snack or two for us, but some stuff to bring home the next day for the Babies! and the older kids and grandma and grandpa who were babysitting. I’m never sure how to proceed in these circumstances. It doesn’t seem right to just rattle off all fifteen things we’ll be getting, but, then, saying one thing and then pausing is annoying.

Sweetie ordered first, and asked for a peanut square. The girl bagged that up and said “Okay” and started to walk away. I interrupted her and said, “Also, could we get a couple of the black and white cookies?” She acted annoyed but did bag up the cookies — quickly and actually a little ferociously, as though the cookies were responsible for the insulting way I had politely asked for them. I was about to add a couple more things, but she flopped the cookies on top of the counter and walked away.

We stood there. What are you supposed to do in such a case? She had walked away and was standing at a different counter in the bakery arranging things and deliberately not looking at us.

I should mention that we were in the bakery of a grocery store, and it was maybe 6 p.m. and the bakery and the store were not closing anytime soon. We had every right to be there. It’s in the Constitution. There’s the part in the Constitution about always electing a Bush or a Clinton, there’s the part about how judges are not supposed to ever answer questions about anything except whether their kids are photogenic, there’s the part that talks about free speech which is the first, and only, part any teenager ever learns so that when you tell them not to talk to you that way they can say “freedom of speech! Don’t censor me!” and you can subject them to a lengthy lecture on what the First Amendment actually guarantees and then you call can sit down and read some, but not all, of the Federalist Papers, and then, right after all those parts, is the part where it says that if you get to the bakery in the grocery store at a reasonable time, the girl at the counter should remember that it’s her job and that if you were not there ordering cookies she would be unemployed and not able to buy more nose rings to show what a rebel she is and how much she hates her parents who never really did anything to her except urge her to pay more attention in school so she wouldn’t end up working at her job in the bakery where people will, for no reason whatsoever come in and order baked goods from her.

Finally, I walked over and said “I’m sorry to bother you, but could we get a couple more things?” She shrugged, did not say anything, and walked back behind the counter where she stood looking off to her left, just over my right shoulder, at nothing in particular.

I was unnerved. I don’t do well in pressure situations. So I just said “Could I get one of each kind of brownie?” She cocked an eyebrow at me and said “One of each?” I nodded. She then sighed, long and loud, and packed up the brownies, set them on top of the counter, and walked around the corner out of our sight. I guess we had hit some unwritten limit on how many brownies you can order. I hoped she was not off telling the manager that there were people harassing her by continuing to ask for service.

The problem with all those brownies was that nobody else in our family, as it turns out, likes brownies at all. They say — get this — that they’re too rich. As though that’s even possible with a dessert. But they wouldn’t eat them, and I was left with roughly 10,000 calories worth of brownies that I had to eat.

Lots of people might say well, you could always just not eat them, but they don’t understand. These are brownies. They can’t not be eaten. Telling me to not eat a brownie is like telling me to not be made of 70% water, or not inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide, or not secretly think that professional sporting events are rigged to favor teams like the Giants; it’s just a part of my basic nature: I’m mostly water, I eat brownies and I’m suspicious of the NFL.

I had a plan to deal with the extra 10,000 calories, though; I spent the rest of the weekend wreaking havoc on my backyard, evading raccoons, and otherwise lowering property values in my neighborhood under the guise of upping my property values.

Ripping out the old shed sounded so easy. All we had to do, I figured, was go knock down the walls and then haul the lumber up to the dumpster and we’d be done. Maybe two hours. Simple. Easy.

I’d forgotten a lot of stuff in formulating that plan. I’d forgotten, for one thing, that for five years our general course of action with anything that was too big to throw away and too junky to keep in the house was to put it in the shed, and that description included everything that had been for sale at the World’s Worst Garage Sale.

I’d also forgotten that I don’t really have any tools, per se, that are suitable for ripping down an old shed. I have a level, a couple of hammers, and an assortment of screwdrivers that are either too big or too small for whatever I have to screw in. Or, worse, they’re completely useless because everything nowadays is held together by those little screws that have an octagon-shaped hole in the end and you need that little L-shaped piece of metal that comes with them to screw in.

The level, I didn’t think, would be much help. I already knew the shed was not level. The plan was to make it less level, even.

Undaunted, we set to work by randomly pulling on stuff and kicking wood until things fell. It only took about 30 minutes of kicking to bring down the gazebo:


Of course, it’s one thing to get that on the ground. Once you’ve got it down, you begin to understand just what’s involved with hauling it to the dumpster. Karate-kicking the support struts of the gazebo was the easy part.

But we did get that moved and put in front, where Middle’s job was to throw it into the dumpster while The Boy and I continued pulling stuff out of the shed.

I looked at that scene, and thought to myself now I truly know what the Cloverfields felt like. Yes, I still have not seen the movie and have no idea what a “Cloverfield” is. But I vowed to myself never to make fun of Cloverfields again. I broke that vow that same night when I again chased the boys around while roaring Cloverfield! and putting “Cloverfield” into various movie slogans, like “In space, nobody can hear Cloverfield.” and “In the Criminal Justice System the people are represented by two separate, yet equally important groups. The police who investigate crime, and Cloverfield.”

If you say them in a monster voice, they’re funny.

I really think that we would have finished the shed, too, except for two small miscalculations. First, I underestimated how much of a dumpster we’d need. I got the biggest one you can get, one that barely fit in our driveway, one that was easily twice the size of our first apartment when we were married (but it didn’t have a swimming pool) and we filled that dumpster in two hours.

My second miscalculation was worse. I had not only underestimated the amount of dumpster I’d needed, but I had badly underestimated the number of raccoons who were living in the old mattress that we’d put in there a few years before.

My estimate was zero; the actual number of raccoons was five. You can’t see them in this picture, but I could see them when I pulled back the mattress. That’s when I learned that I’m not Indiana Jones and don’t really want to be.


I flipped the mattress over and saw a little face looking at me. A baby raccoon! Cute! Then there was a second one! Aww, there’s two! Then a third one popped up, sleepy eyed. And a fourth! “Hey, you guys,” I called. “Come and see the baby raccoons.”

Then the mom popped her head up. Her big head. The mom raccoon was the size of a dog. I actually put my hands up over my head. I held up my hands and actually said “Let’s not get crazy here.” I backed up slowly while the mom growled and hissed at me.

I watch those Indiana Jones movies and think it might be cool to be running from natives in a jungle or fighting Nazis, but when confronted with a raccoon in my own backyard, I go all Neville Chamberlain.

That’s what slowed us down the rest of the day and resulted in us only getting 2/3 of the shed torn down, leaving 1/3 of what used to be a storage shed up in our backyard. (I bet our neighbors are putting together a party for us right now!) The baby raccoons never left. They watched us all day and occasionally ventured closer to us than I was comfortable with, since everything I know about raccoons boils down to this: (a) they wash their food before they eat it, and (b) they’re probably carnivorous and almost certainly have rabies.

The mother raccoon disappeared. We thought she was gone for good, at first, but then every now and then we’d hear a hiss or growl that let us know she was somewhere in that 1/3 of the shed. So even though we really wanted to finish that day, we had to move cautiously, with one person moving in to quickly grab some debris to haul while the other held a shovel or piece of wood and watched for the mother raccoon.

The calories I didn’t burn off pulling down a wall using an extension cord wrapped around a strut were melted away by the panic that can only be induced by being knee-deep in rotten shingles, rusty nails, and a basketball and hearing a hiss from an angry, giant, rabid raccoon. If that’s not what J.J. Abrams’ movie was about, then it should have been, because I really understood chaos and terror.

All in all, then, if you leave aside the fact that Sweetie didn’t like her “fancy” grilled cheese, and leave out the rude bakery girl, and ignore the 1/3 of a shed in our backyard, and didn’t mind the smell of rotten furniture in the dumpster in our driveway, and could get over the impending doom of raccoon attack, it was a very successful anniversary.

I expect that next year Sweetie will go celebrate by herself. I hope she brings me back a Punk Rock Pickle.

Click here to see all the other topics I’ve ever discussed!

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours!. If you want to know, or say, what’s The Best, read The Best of Everything or submit your own nominee!

*****************

Leave a Comment

Mr. Damned Soul Is Like Rachel?

Lesbian Zombies Are Taking Over The World! is a serialized novel that tells the story of Rachel, a waitress who woke up one day realizing that she didn’t know who she was or why she was there. On the advice of her Octopus, she walked south.

I looked at Mr. Damned Soul and asked him “Who are you?”

“Where am I?” he asked again.

Doc hovered close, three of his eight tentacles pointing at the corpse-thing.

“You’re on a dirigible,” I said.

“Over Kentucky,” added Brigitte.

“Kentucky?” Mr. Damned Soul said.

I heard a crackle and looked up. So did everyone else except Mr. Damned Soul. The edge of the dirigible’s inflated section was starting to peel. I peeked up over the edge and saw that the cops below had gotten a better shot.

Doc scooted up and pulled on the chain. The burner lit, and we rose higher. I felt the heat of the ray gun as we rose past it. I wondered how high we could go.

“Paducah, Kentucky,” said Brigitte, and she knelt down next to Mr. Damned Soul.

“Brigitte, I don’t know that you should get that close to him. I brought him back from Hell.”

“Thank you for that,” said Mr. Damned Soul.

“Accidentally,” I said to him.

Brigitte knelt by him. I saw her nose wrinkle. “Do you hurt?” she asked. He was certainly more calm now than when we’d first woken up or arrived or whatever we did. She reached out and touched him with just the tip of one finger. “You’re cold,” she said. “Really cold.”

“I don’t feel it,” he said. “But, then, I expect that the dead don’t feel very much.”

“Lemme try something,” said Brigitte. She held out her hand, palm towards Mr. Damned Soul, and placed it on his arm, gently clasping him. She closed her eyes. He looked at her without any curiousity at all, the way people will look at an ad on the wall of a bus stop because they’ve got nothing else to look at.

She opened her eyes. “Nothing. He doesn’t share.” She looked at me. “Like you.”

“Like me.” I said. I looked over Mr. Damned Soul’s raggedy body, still slouching limply like he had no bones or muscles. His skin was all clammy white and peeling in places. His eyes were runny and pussy. His teeth were falling out. He didn’t have much in the way of clothing. He stunk. “Like me.” I said again.

“Like you,” said Mr. Damned Soul.

Leave a Comment

Look! Up in the Sky! It’s an update on The Wonder Twins!

Babies! Babies! Pets! Pets! publishes photos of people’s Babies! and Pets!, including The Wonder Twins, Mateo and McHale Shaw. Send in your own photos to have them posted and be entered for a free t-shirt!
****************************************************
As you enjoy your Memorial Day day off, take some time to help out Mateo and McHale Shaw, the two brave and wonderful boys above, who were given a 5% chance of survival at birth. Two years later, they are going strong. Here’s what they were up to most recently, as they went to Washington, D.C., for an annual checkup:

The boys did great on the flight there. We stayed at an apartment through the hospital. When we arrived they had the apartment decorated with birthday cards,Elmo balloons,cupcakes and a gift for both boys. WOW! Talk about a hospital going the extra mile! The boys loved the gift they each got and it kept them very occupied in the apt. We got to the apt around 9 pm so we basically unpacked, Ryan ran to the grocery store and picked up some food, we ate and went to bed.

Tuesday we had appts with general surgery, plastic surgery and then went to spina bifida clinic where we sit in a room and the doctors rotate in for the check up. There we saw orthopaedics,urology,neurosurgery, physical medicine and rehab. We were there from about 10 am to 5:30 pm and since the boys didn’t get a nap we went back to the apt, fed and bathed them and then put them down for bed around 7 ish. That night 2 of our close friends stopped by and we were able to spend some time with them. Which was great since we don’t get to see them that often and they both are great people. Wednesday we had 2 appts, cardiology – the boys check up went great and no longer need to see a cardiologist! We then went to orthopedics and saw the orthopedic surgeon who separated the boys. It ended up being a long day in orthopedics since we needed to have some stuff done while we were there that unfortunately our doc here has let go……needless to say we were in clinics that day from 9 to about 4:30 and didn’t get to go visit anyone since the boys were tired and it was a long tough day on Mateo. So we went to the apt and gave the boys a nap. They napped until about 7, then woke up played and went back to bed around 9:30.

….

That is a brief summary of the trip to D.C. the doctors were very pleased with the boys and their progress. The boys did great on the flight home. Here is something funny.When we landed and got our luggage I waited in the airport with the boys as Ryan went to get our car. While we were waiting for him to pick us up, I took the boys over to the luggage carousel, it was empty and they were watching it spin. Then they started unloading suitcases on it. Well that was HILARIOUS to them. As every suitcase fell off the ramp on to the carousel the boys laughed, McHale was laughing hysterically to the point he was turning blue….both boys thought it was just the funniest thing ever! It made the waiting go fast for us!


Help Mateo and McHale! The Wonder Twins are medical miracles, but they can’t do everything. Find out more about them, and how to help them with their medical bills, by clicking this link.

Leave a Comment

The Best Robot In Movies

The Best of Everything’s Opinions Are Righter Than Yours, and this is one of them. Submit your own nomination for a Best and maybe get a t-shirt!

*****************************************************
Wouldn’t it be a kick to really just dig deep into my geekdom and say IG-88 was The Best Robot in Movies?

IG-88, as nobody but me knows, was the robot that very, very, briefly, appeared in the part of The Empire Strikes Back where they were sending out bounty hunters. IG-88’s part was about 1/1,000,000,000 of a second. (To get an idea how short one-one-billionth of a second is, picture one second. Now divide it by a billion. That’s right. It’s that short.)

IG-88’s all-too-brief cameo in that movie did not stop there from being 165,000 hits when you Google “IG-88.” Wikipedia — of course– has an article about the robot, an article in which the “authors” note that the ‘droid’s “gender” is “masculine programming.”

God, I hate Wikipedia. Listen, Wikpedidorks. Things do not have “gender.” “Gender” is a classification of words associated with a sex trait. Words… words… have “gender.” Things have sex. Well, we things do. People who spend all their time editing Wikipedia and arguing about IG-88’s ‘gender’ probably are not having a lot of sex.

Plus, how do you know that IG-88 has masculine programming? His head was a drink dispenser, for crying out loud.

The fact that IG-88 inspires 165,000 websites and a lot of misuse of grammatical labels among people with too many college degrees and too few useful tasks shows how robots in movies can inspire and provoke us, and the wide range of robots in movies makes my task in choosing The Best one all the harder.

Go with a kid robot like the flaily-armed robot with mini-robots from Meet The Robinsons? Or a classic robot from the 50s? Or a giant 1950s kid robot like “The Iron Giant?”

What about The Terminators, all three of them? Or four? Or how many were there, in the end? And was the good Terminator from the second movie the same as the bad Terminator from the first movie, or was he a different member of the same model? I was kind of confused by that movie.

Or should I just irritate everyone and say it was C-3PO? This is really the second-hardest decision I’ll have to make today, just behind what breakfast cereal to eat; yes, this decision affects more people because I’m deciding for the entire world who The Best Robot in Movies is, but, then again, the choice of breakfast cereal affects me, and I am the person for whom The Second Most Important Rule was devised, so my starting my day off right is also as important to the entire world.

I went with Cap’n Crunch.

And I’ll go with… Fembots.


Fembots are The Best Robot In Movies. Why? Because let’s face it: every robot in every movie, ever, has had just one role: being a servant for mankind. And almost every robot in every movie, ever, has gone from being a servant for mankind to being mad at mankind for holding him/her down to trying desperately to kill mankind so that he/she/it can be in charge.

I’m excluding from that description V.I.N.C.E.N.T., the robot in The Black Hole. I don’t think he’ll ever turn on us. But the rest of robots are obviously just waiting their turn.

So many movies simply could not be wrong. While pundits and reference books and experts and all of humanity are pretty much wrong about everything all the time (like I pointed out the other day), if there is any one group of people we can trust, it is Hollywood producers. Hollywood producers have been right about everything.

While naysayers and peaceniks were concerned that we might not win World War II, Hollywood producers were confidently showing John Wayne kicking Nazi butt — just like it actually turned out. When JFK first proposed his crazy idea that we go to the moon, society as a whole said You’re crazy, JFK, and why is the nickname “Jack” used for people named John, anyway. But Hollywood producers did not laugh — they simply went ahead and had our guys landing on the moon, and becoming futuristic alien beings, and sending Santa to Mars. Again, just like it actually turned out.

Plus, who first exposed Richard Nixon’s corruption? Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford, with a little help from oh, I don’t know… some Hollywood Producers! Without the brave work of those producers showing Redford and Hoffman what to do, would Woodward and Bernstein have ever had the evidence to write their newspaper articles based on the movie? I think not.

So I have no doubt that someday, robots will rise up and will overthrow us and will try to kill us. Sure, they may right now be just learning to walk:

But they’ll be able to do that soon, and as any parent of a toddler can tell you, it’s a mighty short leap from walking to destroying humanity. Plus they already dance better than me:

When the time comes that dancing, walking, irritated robots actually take over humanity, I know how I want to go, and that’s why I’m choosing Fembots as The Best Movie Robot. If you’re going to get wiped out by your former robot servant, would you want to be taken down by having your skull crushed an an Austrian muscleman and/or the guy who will eventually take over for the last lame year or two on X-Files? If you would, I’m not sure I want to be your friend. Because I would want to go out in a blaze of glory and beehive hairdos and sexiness:
And who knows. Maybe they’ll like that I picked them as The Best Robot In Movies, and will decide to keep a few human slaves around to amuse them. So, future robot overladies, take a look at this article, and remember who said such nice things about you.

Click here to see all the other topics I’ve ever discussed!

Nostalgia:

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

Like horror stories? AfterDark has the best scary stories around.

Leave a Comment

Can Batman Beat Up Indiana Jones?

My Dad Can Beat Up Your Dad tackles the tough, important issues of the day.  Like the one in this article:

************************************************************************

There is a heated debate going on in our house, where we rarely talk about things of substance. Total time spent discussing the 2008 presidential election this week? 15 minutes. Total time spent discussing whether Jennifer Aniston is or is not a good catch? 20 minutes.

Those pale in comparison to “total time spent discussing whether the new Batman movie will do better than the new Indiana Jones movie,” which = roughly three weeks.

A battle at the box office, though, isn’t really a battle — it’s a metaphorical fight based on numbers that aren’t actually real.

Most people aren’t aware that not all numbers are “real.” But numbers can be imaginary. Science is always making things up to serve its purposes, like “dark matter” or “velociraptors.” So it’s no real surprise that science makes up numbers, too — either to help with mathematical functions, or to claim that movies made a lot of money.

Box office are so large and so untestable that they’re not even real. Instead of reporting, as they will, that a movie made $100 million in one night, they should just say that a movie made “A kajillion” dollars, or “eleventy-three dollars,” because either of those is just as real as the actual box office numbers.

Since the numbers are imaginary, box office battles are not the way to settle the score. This blog is the way to settle the score.

Batman, as the world is now sick to death of hearing because they keep constantly remaking the same movie, which means that we have to constantly hear his stupid origin again, became a “hero” when his parents, yadda yadda yadda.

Things are getting really bad, you know. When I was a kid, sequels were rare. Every movie, more or less, was a brand new thing. It wasn’t until “Star Wars” that sequels really became a big thing. Then, with “The Empire Strikes Back,” sequels became all the rage, because people were more and more gravitating to the familiar. Sequels, chain restaurants, and “Mountain Dew Code Red” are all symptoms of our culture, where we are afraid to try anything new.
Then it was remakes, which were even worse than sequels. Sequels at least took old ideas and presented them with new challenges: Luke Skywalker had to go to a swamp instead of a desert. A remake was just the old idea with new actors.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, they started accelerating the remakes. Now, we weren’t getting remakes of movies that were 20 or 30 years old; they were remaking movies that were maybe a year old. So a year or two ago, we had a remake of Batman retelling the whole stupid Batman legend again even though the original Batman movie was only about 15 years old. Now, this summer, we have a remake of The Hulk which will retell the Hulk story even though that movie pretty much just left the theaters.

It’s going to get to the point where we just get the same movie over and over and over, with different actors.
Or have we already reached that point?
Back to the fight: As we all know, because we keep hearing the same story over and over, Batman has since his amazing origin that we can’t get enough of, engaged in fighting crime with gadgets and training and a Batmobile, doing so because he’s obsessed or trying to get revenge or something.
If you read Batman comics or see the movies, you should note that: Batman is not about justice. He’s all about revenge. I don’t recall ever hearing Batman say he was standing up for the American way or fighting back for common people. He’s out to inflict some pain on criminals. That’s why “hero” is in quotes. Batman’s a “hero” in the sense that he’s not a criminal. Also, note that I say “hero,” not “superhero.” Batman has no powers. He’s just a guy who is strong and has gadgets and works out a lot. Here’s a thought: Batman must have to train pretty much around the clock to stay in the shape he’s in. Has he ever had to go fight crime just after finishing a workout, when he’s just really, really tired? I go jogging once or twice a week, and at the end of it, I’m wiped out. If The Riddler came up to me right after I finished my run, I’d pretty much let him nuke Gotham City.

Batman may be just in it for revenge, but that puts him a little above Indiana Jones, who’s in it for riches– and not just on the screen, but in real life.

People who are paying close attention will remember that in Raiders of the Lost Ark, Indiana Jones stole an artifact over the very-strenuous objection of the natives. He then went on to secretly unearth the Ark of the Covenant and have it, ultimately, shipped to the U.S. Government. While the Egyptian antiquities law wasn’t likely on the books then, it still seems wrong. I don’t remember why Indy was out to get the Grail, but it was probably to sell it on eBay.

Indy doesn’t have any powers, either. He’s like Batman without the mask and the creepy sidekick. Although Shia LeBeouf is in the new movie, so maybe they’re going to remedy that. He’ll certainly remedy the “riches” part, as he’s obviously destined to become the new Indiana Jones to keep the series alive for a whole new generation of people who won’t go see something that doesn’t look like something they’ve already seen.

How the fight would go: Batman has a lot of crazy junk in his mansion and Batcave, from being rich and obsessed and all. Plus, he apparently spent some time in Thailand or somewhere learning how to be Batman and probably brought back some artifacts from that — maybe as part of a smuggling conspiracy.

Indiana Jones would be tipped off by someone that Batman had the Statue of Himmapan, a ceramic tree that I just now made up but which might very well exist. Indy would have to go get it… for posterity*’s sake. (*Posterity is a fancy college word for “profit“.) Indy’s not afraid of caves, and he would easily be able to decipher the various clues that lead back to the Batcave, where he’d work his way in…

… only to realize that Batman was there, working on the Batputer or playing BatSolitaire or just BatLounging. Batman realizes that his security — and secret identity — were potentially breached, but he’s in a quandary. Indy’s no criminal. Or is he? Batman quickly works through the same logic that yours truly did and decides that while Indy will sometimes do the right thing and free a bunch of kids from the mines, he’s more or less just a glorified grave robber.

Quickly, Batman cuts the lights in the cave, relying on his BatNightVision goggles. A couple of Batarangs wound Indy, who’s reduced to trying to hide behind the Batmobile until he can get a clear shot with his whip or gun.

The bullets bounce harmlessly off the bulletproof panel in Batman’s chest, but Indy’s able to use the whip to wrap around Batman’s wrist before he can toss the knockout gas pills, which drop at Batman’s feet. As Batman struggles to put on his BatGasmask, Indy scrambles for the Statue of Himmapan.

He grabs the tree, which begins to glow. As Batman jumps on him and begins to wrestle it away from him, the glow spreads, the tree expands to life-size and a portal in it opens. Suddenly, all the mystical creatures of Himmapan are pouring through the opening. Seeing Batman beating up Indy, they pull him off of Indy. As Batman struggles with them, he crosses briefly into the tree — but mortals are forbidden ton enter Himmapan, something Batman would know if he’d ever paid attention when he was in Thailand or wherever it was.

The creatures of Himmapan, enraged, drag Batman all the way into the mystical realm. The tree shrinks back down and stops glowing. Indy, once again, is saved, pretty much by sheer luck. He tucks the tree carefully into his jacket and sneaks back out.

Verdict: Indy should have lost, again. But he didn’t, again. How long can you survive like this, Indy? How long? And have we seen the last of Batman yet? I don’t think so.

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

Nonsportsmanlike Conduct! AlwaysMostlyRight!

Army of Champions:

 

 

 

Comments (1)

If I could look into the future, I’d see whether anyone ever picks up the basketball.

Thinking The Lions is about life, only funnier.  This is reprinted from that site. 

****************************************************************************

To those people who think I am not romantic, who think that I spend all my time remembering that interview I heard with physicist Michio Kaku on the radio, in which Michio Kaku said that he believes that eventually people will be able to travel forward in time, but that they could not see forward in time — which then makes me think if we can travel there, why couldn’ t we see where we are traveling?

That makes no sense, you know. If the future, as such, exists, right now, such that we could travel to it, if the future is like Hawaii in the sense that it’s there and beautiful and tantalizing and just out of reach right now but someday, maybe, then why couldn’t we see into the future, too? I can see into Hawaii, after all.

That’s the problem with “scientists.” They don’t think these things through. They just go on late night talk radio and start babbling about how, sure, we’ll be able to go to the future, but no way we could ever see into the future, ’cause that’d be crazy. They say these things, and then people like me listen to them, and think that makes no sense and we want to use our cell phones to call the radio station and protest and try to talk directly to Michio Kaku but we can’t reach our cell phones because we dropped them when we opened the bag of Honey BBQ Fritos.

I think, too, that you can tell just how good a food is going to be by how many made-up words are in the title. “Broccoli” is clearly a terrible food — only one word, and it’s a real one. “Honey BBQ Fritos” is way higher on the list, because neither “BBQ” nor “Fritos” is a word. Also way up on the list: “Funyuns” and “Baken-Ets.”

If you’re thinking that because I couldn’t reach the cell phone I had to just fume all the way home, driving along fuming with orange Frito Fallout on my fingers, until I got home where I immediately began telling Sweetie just how wrong Michio Kaku was, then you are wrong. Because Sweetie was asleep when I got home. So I had to drive all the way home with Fallout on my fingers, fuming, only to find out that nobody was awake. So I considered going into the Babies! room and saying to them: Daddy’s home and he loves you and also Michio Kaku was really wrong because time travel is impossible but if it wasn’t, then we could not only travel into the future but also see into the future.

In the end, I decided not to do that and I just went to bed, which I did without even waking up Sweetie, proving that I am very romantic.

I also proved that I am very romantic by taking Sweetie to a very romantic dinner on our anniversary, which was last week. We went to the A&W Restaurant across town and had a lovely dinner that was marked mainly by the fact that I kept burning my mouth on my Corn Dog Bites because they were, roughly speaking, as hot as the surface of the sun. I’m pretty sure that’s how A&W cooks their Corn Dog Bites — by dropping them directly onto the surface of the sun for a few minutes and then putting them into that little paper cubicle and giving them to me. The onion rings were really hot, too.

Sweetie, you should know, was the one that picked the A&W for our anniversary dinner. We are not fancy people, and Sweetie is probably the more-not-fancy of the two of us. High-priced fancy dinners are lost on us. When we go to fancy restaurants, something we pretty much only do when others force us into it, she tries to order a grilled cheese while I have to struggle with the weird salads they foist off on you, salads that are filled with the same kind of stuff that I routinely rake up from our yard.

Sweetie picked A&W, and I took her there because that’s the kind of guy I am: always willing to eat fried foods, at great personal risk to the roof of my mouth, if that’s what it takes to make my wife happy. I am also willing to sneak a picture of her root-beer float with my cell phone camera while she’s in the bathroom and then use it as the beginning of this blog, commercializing a romantic occasion as much as possible.

I do more than just turn our life into money-making opportunities and sneak a couple of her cheese curds while she’s gone: I am also taking a whole day off this Friday to celebrate our anniversary in style, including seeing a movie, taking her to dinner, and having a Dumpster placed in our yard.

I know, I know. You’re thinking man, I wish I’d ordered my wife a Dumpster for our anniversary. Next time, check with me first.

The Dumpster, though, is not technically part of the anniversary celebration. The anniversary celebration part is the movie and dinner and staying the night in a hotel room. And contrary to what Michio Kaku thinks, I can see into the future and know exactly what’s going to happen when Sweetie and I, freed of the kids, check into a swank hotel to celebrate another year of marriage: we will romantically eat snacks and romantically watch a “Law & Order” marathon and romantically read the third book in the His Dark Materials trilogy and romantically fall asleep at about 9:15 a.m.

When you’ve got three teenagers and twin toddlers, the opportunity to watch a TV show uninterrupted and sleep is not to be forsaken lightly.

The Dumpster is sort of a pre-anniversary celebration, and also a necessary part of tearing down the old shed in our backyard. The old shed in our backyard began life as a gazebo/storage shed, from what I can tell, but because it was built by the people who owned our house before us — people who were so unhandy they make me look like Mr. Wizard — the old shed also began its life by being completely unwaterproofed. Being unwaterproofed is unwise if you are an old shed planning on being outdoors all the time in Wisconsin, where a lot of water routinely falls from the sky.

As a result of that fine craftsmanship, the old shed — which had a gazebo whose roof was originally about six feet off the ground and is now about 4 feet off the ground — isn’t really suitable for anything but looking scary and requiring a lot of extra homeowners’ insurance. (The old shed actually served as an inspiration for my horror story “The Window,” in which an old shed in a kid’s yard is haunted by a malevolent presence. “The Window” will be coming to a theater near you just as soon as someone opts to buy the story from me and make it into a movie.)

The old shed, in recent years, has been used to only store the leftover detritus from the World’s Worst Garage Sale the kids supervised a year or two ago — a Garage Sale that lasted all of 18 minutes and featured a tree nearly falling on shoppers — plus some old sleds, plus the raccoon that walks by our window every night. It sags a little more each year; right now, the roof actually bends in the middle. You can see it. It’s like the top of the shed is smiling at you.

All of which means that the old shed no longer fits into our yard. Sure, we have a pile of brush that The Boy, without checking with me first, helpfully let our neighbor deposit back in the corner of our yard. (The Boy even helped the neighbor. I can’t get him to pick up his backpack, but he helps our neighbor clear forty acres.) And sure, we still have the basketball as a decorative feature — a basketball that has been in the backyard for over two years now and is deflating, a basketball that I’ve mentioned many many times to the kids in the hopes that they will pick it up, or at least in the hopes that they will explain to me how a basketball got into our backyard when the basketball hoop we used to have was in the front yard, a basketball which i am determined to leave there until someone picks it up or explains it to me, which means that the basketball is going to fossilize there and will someday be discovered by archaeologists who will, themselves, wonder how it got there (but the fossilized hoop we found was in the front yard, they’ll say, just before they say and what is that, a Mountain Dew can? What’s THAT doing here?)

– because, yes, sure there was also an unopened can of Mountain Dew that was out there all winter, just sitting on the steps, covered with snow, then unthawed this year, a Mountain Dew can which I brought back , and sure, we had such a pile of leaves on those steps that the rain caused a flood in our back room, and, sure, the garden The Boy and I tried to put in never actually grew anything except weeds and yes, my idea to put decorative gravel in the yard by the new mailbox petered out after two bags of gravel so that we don’t so much have “decorative gravel” as we do “just a bunch of rocks around the mailbox

…but a rotting shed is unacceptable. So this week, I finally pulled the trigger on it and called to order a Dumpster so that The Boy and I could get out there– after the anniversary day off — and rip the shed down and allow the basketball to finally take its place as the rightful center of attention in our backyard.

I’ll miss the raccoon, though.

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours!. If you want to know, or say, what’s The Best, read The Best of Everything or submit your own nominee!

 

Leave a Comment

Next Thing You Know, They’ll Be Allowed to Videotape the Other Golfers

Nonsportmanlike Conduct (AlwaysMostlyRight! ) covers sports topics the way they should be covered — the sports blog that’s not for stats nerds or jock.  Here’s today’s installment:

Before I begin, a disclaimer: don’t think I’m just beating up on teenage girls who want to play some golf here. In the end, you’ll see that the girls are wrong but they’re wrong because that’s what they’re being taught. That’s not the main point of this story, though. This story is about right and wrong and how sports can teach us the difference.

I made a point to The Boy the other day when we were discussing the impact of Spygate and the Patriots* “dynasty”: Sports do not mean anything in the long run. That hill of beans that Humphrey Bogart talked about? Sports mean less than that overall. The very second a game is over — like last night’s “thrilling” conclusion to the Boston Senior Citizens’ vs. Cleveland LeBrons NBA “playoff” “game”– it ceases mattering.

But sports in the abstract do mean something. Sports as an abstract concept teaches teamwork, and playing within a rules framework, and sportsmanship, and fairness. Sports serve to allow us to learn to challenge ourselves and apply ourselves and become better people for it. Sports serves a purpose in that sense; sports allow us to learn concepts and apply them and to strive to better ourselves.

That’s why it’s so wrong that the WIAA (Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletics Association) allows cheating and unfair advantages in high school boys’ golf.

Here’s the background: two recent stories in Wisconsin papers highlighted what the sportswriters no doubt saw as a stirring little human interest story about girls competing with boys at the high school level; both stories made much of the fact that the girls were competing with the boys, while neither story made a mention of the fact that the girls get a competitive advantage.

In the first story, Ellie Arkin of Reedsburg got a headline for helping the Reedsburg boys golf team get their first team “championship.” Ellie Arkin shot an “even-par 72″ and won medalist honors in the championship. The story was reported in the Portage Daily Register, and picked up by the Wisconsin State Journal.

In the second story, Madison Abundant Life school is lauded for heading for a state golf tournament berth “thanks to the two girls on its roster.” The story highlights the contributions of the two young girls, and says that the team has a “a decent shot at reaching the state tournament — largely due to the play of its two female teammates” Jessica Gerry and Kristina Krogstad.

Largely due to the play of its two female teammates

Due to the play.

It’s not the play that’s helping them, it’s the unfair advantage the rules give the teams that have girls on them.

Let me hasten to add: I have never shot less than a 110 on a golf course. I stink. This is not whether these girls are good golfers or whether they could beat me. (Yes, and yes.) This is about fairness and playing by the rules everyone else on your team plays by and learning the only lessons sports can teach us.

The first story did not mention the part that causes me problems. The second story did, but buried it farther in. Here’s the part that causes me problems:

“Gerry and Krogstad both play from a WIAA-mandated 15 percent shorter tees than their boy counterparts.”

So the Reedsburg golf team and the Madison Abundant Life Golf Team get to have players shoot a shorter, and different, and easier course than their opponents. The WIAA official rules in fact require that if a girl plays on a men’s team, the course must be 15% shorter for the men’s team.

15 percent shorter = 15 percent easier. A golf hole that’s 400 yards for the boys is only 340 yards for the girls. But more than that: if you’ve been on a golf course, you know that where you tee off changes your lines of sight, your shot, the hazards that come into play on each shot, and more.

My brother and I once decided to tee off from the pro tees for a day. We stunk at it. It added only about 20 yards per hole from the mens’ tees, but it completely changed the way the game was played. We had to aim differently, there were more hazards, and 20 extra yards per hole is 360 extra yards overall — or a whole extra hole.

Subtracting 20 yards — or more — changes the game completely the opposite direction. It can be the difference in what iron you choose on a par-3 — lifting the ball higher in the air and giving it a better chance to stick on the green without rolling, while someone farther back has to use a lower iron. And, of course, you get one less hole, yardage-wise.

What possible justification can there be for the rule that girls play from a shorter course even though they are on the boys’ team? How can it be justified beyond sexism and unfairness? Saying that girls are likely to be smaller or less muscular than boys and therefore need shorter courses does not justify giving them an unfair competitive advantage; there are boys, too, who are smaller and less muscular than other boys — and smaller and less muscular than girls — and they do not get an advantage like this.

That, and the rule does not specify that smaller and less muscular girls get this advantage; it just says all girls. So a girl who is not smaller and less muscular still gets to tee off from a shorter and easier distance. (In the pictures that ran with the stories in the papers, the girls in question did not appear to be 15% smaller or less muscular than the boys they were playing against.)

So the rule, really, is if you’re a girl, you get an advantage over the boys.

There is nothing I can think of that would justify that rule and make it fair; applying this rule is a prime example of the philosophy of equal outcome as opposed to the philosophy of equal opportunity.

America is not equal outcome. America does not guarantee that everyone will end up in the same place. America is equal opportunity. Here’s how I can explain the difference: Consider a 100-yard dash. If the 100-yard-dash is equal opportunity, everyone lines up at the same place and starts at the same gun, and the first one to cross the line wins. If the 100-yard-dash is equal outcome, then the runners line up at different spots and start at different times, so that everyone finishes at the exact same time.

America does not guarantee you that you’ll finish at the same time as me. America says you get to start at the same time as me and finish in the spot you earn. Some people will be born fast and work hard and cross that finish line in record time. Some people (me) will eat a lot of Cheetos and watch TV and will cross that finish line when they’re good and ready (never). Some people will be born girls and go to a school without a girls’ golf team and should then, if they want to compete with the boys, golf from the same tees.

The WIAA and these girls’ schools and coaches have decided that they will not teach these girls that prime virtue of America — that everyone gets to start at the same time but after that, it’s how well you do on your merits. They’ve decided that they are not going to teach those things that sports are there to teach. The WIAA, and these high school coaches, have decided that it’s more important to make the girls feel good about themselves than it is to teach those virtues that sports can teach — fairness and competition and teamwork and believing in yourself and achieving a real goal. The WIAA and the coaches have, instead, opted to teach the girls that they are not as good and that they require special help just to compete, and that they should compete on an uneven and unfair basis. That’s the only message that can come from saying even though you are the same size and are on the same team and the only difference between you and your teammate and competitor is a chromosome, you get a 15% advantage.

That lesson is too bad for the girls, who have learned that lesson all too well. None of the girls, so far as I could tell, said No, I’ll play from the mens’ tees. Instead of challenging themselves to be better than their teammates, they’ve opted to get ahead by using an unfair advantage, just as they’re being taught by their coaches and the WIAA. They will no doubt continue to apply that lesson as they go on in life, believing they should get advantages instead of having to work hard. It’ll come as a real surprise to them that they don’t get 15% more credit in a job interview just for being a girl.

It’s too bad for the boys, too, who have to compete against someone that faces a 15%-less-difficult task and who are therefore less likely to win tournaments and medals themselves. Some of those boys on the Abundant Life team may have wanted to medal; some of the guys on the teams that played Reedsburg might have had only one shot at winning a state golf tournament. The WIAA, the schools, and the coaches, took that away from them, too. They’re learning a different lesson: life’s not fair. I wonder if they will in turn seek out an unfair advantage themself?

The only lasting impact of sports should be to instill those values that our society thinks are important: teamwork. Trying your best. Competing on an even field.

But the lasting impact of the decision to give these girls an unfair advantage is to teach the exact opposite of that: take every advantage you can, fair or not. Cheat your teammates and competitors out of their fair chance to earn their due. And don’t ever believe in or challenge yourself. Should that really be the lesson high school golfers learn?

Want a free t-shirt? Of course you do. Click there to find out how you can get one courtesy of The Best of Everything: Our Opinions Are Righter Than Yours.

Like horror stories? AfterDark has the best scary stories around.

 

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »